Recent Comments




Voters with Criminal Records and Bad Background Checks…

September 25, 2008 14:44 by Desiree Bryant

Today, the CEO of our company received an email from the Arrested Development Foundation (ADF) publicizing their “Project New Vote.” He thought it was a joke (maybe because its name parodies the band Arrested Development), but, with further research , found it was an organization that assists criminal offenders in expunging criminal records, finding employment , and exercising their rights to vote under certain state laws.


I’m not so sure I want any major criminals choosing my next president or voting on propositions that could sway toward lenient criminal laws, but apparently the legislators in 39 states believe they should be given that right after serving their time.  ADF has a portal where ex-offenders can find out if they are eligible to vote in their state, which depends on the crime, the time served, and the extent of their criminal records.


I checked out the website at http://www.arrestfoundation.org/index.htm , which argues that there is a great deal of nonviolent offenders or people who have had a run in with the law at some point, but have been rehabilitated. They also state that the way hiring managers deal with background checks is discriminatory to those with criminal records, reporting that most employers make their hiring decision based on the background check before the applicant has a chance to explain the crime or make the case that they have been rehabilitated. ADF also believes that hiring ex-offenders will decrease the rate of recidivism and reduce the overall crime rate.

Here’s my take on ADF’s position…


People who make mistakes pay for them in one way or another and those who truly want to change their lives after crime naturally must try harder than law abiding citizens to get a job. But that is the additional price they pay for the crimes they committed, whether it’s right or wrong. Those of us who have never broken the law should be given preference above those who have. Why should an employer simply trust every applicant with a criminal record and give ex-offenders a chance? It must be on a case-by-case basis and depending on the position in relation to the crime. I wouldn’t hire a two-time thief to run a cash register, for instance.


If you have a criminal record you know is going to show up on a background check, you will have to go the extra mile in contacting the hiring manager and convincing him or her that you are a changed person and deserve a chance at a job or career, but you can feel confident that you have the right to vote (if allowed in your state).
I would advise those with criminal records to go to our MyBackgroundCheck.com newsroom where there are two helpful articles on how background checks affect job seekers and explore other resources throughout the site.


Industry experts, ex-offenders, concerned citizens, and HR people are welcome to post comments to this with thoughts on these issues.

Blogging
Fusion Blog Directory Business Blogs -
BlogCatalog Blog Directory Directory of Jobs Blogs Technorati Profile

*We welcome relevant comments and questions from consumers, experts, and human resources professionals. Please do not submit comments with advertisements as they will not be posted publicly. Thanks for visiting our blog!

Comments

September 27. 2008 12:17

"assists criminal offenders in expunging criminal records, finding employment , and exercising their rights to vote under certain state laws.


I’m not so sure I want any major criminals choosing my next president or voting on propositions that could sway toward lenient criminal laws,"

This is the only statement in this whole blog that i take issue with. We live in the United States of America, we fought a revolutionary war over representation, we fought a civil war over citizen rights, and though we don't call it a war the civil rights movement fought for equal treatment of all americans. Through out our countries history people have fought for their rights and some have one and others have lost, but what makes our country great is the fact that because they are American they have rights. For the 200 plus years of our countries existance we have fought for our right to vote and be equal. Saying that criminals should be able to vote is tantamount to saying that Non Land owning people can't vote, or that women can't vote. The people in our prisons as long as they are citizens of this Country should have the right to vote, they should be encouraged to vote.

So before you decide that the right to vote should be taken away look at the years it took us to get that right. Look at the suffering that all people in this country went through, don't assume that because someone is in prison they are less of a citizen than you are.

Josh

October 8. 2008 21:45

I agree with the article and I am also against the criminals voting rights should be taken off. I agree that they are also citizens. But being responsible citizens they shouldn't have committed crime in their own country against their own people. So are they good enough to vote to select a responsible person to take care of this country?? when they themselves are not responsible enough towards their country??

seems

June 20. 2009 15:50

Nice article.I agree with the article and I am also against the criminals voting rights should be taken off.They are also citizens,but they should have responsibility...

Life insurance

July 30. 2009 06:39

They have every right to vote as with all other citizens. Even if they are criminals, their opinions still count, they are still Americans, and no matter how much crimes they have committed i still think most have the country's progress and success at heart. God bless America!

Charlie Davidson

July 30. 2009 13:49

I feel to disagree with it that criminals should not be allowed to vote. This is harsh thing to do. If they have done something wrong and then they want to be a good citizen then they should get that chance. Not all fingers are equal in society. But if you still feel that they should not be allowed then there are also people other then criminals who should not be allowed to vote. Anyone can make judgment error.

sem

August 20. 2009 10:27

Thanks for sharing this informative post.

Paid Surveys

September 14. 2009 05:14

If someone has committed crime this does not mean that he should not have right to vote. But yes their record need to be maintained.

dubai flats for rent

October 21. 2009 02:49

I like what I see. keep it going

fast cash advance

Add comment


 

  Country flag

Note: the following html tags can be used to customize your comment (optional):
[b][/b] - [i][/i] - [u][/u]- [quote][/quote]