MyBackgroundCheck.com
1,133,290 profiles created to date.  Sign Up Now  |   Already have an account?  
Search Blog
  Your background should’nt be a secret. MyBackgroundCheck.com believes you should control who has access to your information.



 

Voters with Criminal Records and Bad Background Checks…

by Desiree Bryant 9/25/2008 2:44:00 PM

Today, the CEO of our company received an email from the Arrested Development Foundation (ADF) publicizing their “Project New Vote.” He thought it was a joke (maybe because its name parodies the band Arrested Development), but, with further research , found it was an organization that assists criminal offenders in expunging criminal records, finding employment , and exercising their rights to vote under certain state laws.


I’m not so sure I want any major criminals choosing my next president or voting on propositions that could sway toward lenient criminal laws, but apparently the legislators in 39 states believe they should be given that right after serving their time.  ADF has a portal where ex-offenders can find out if they are eligible to vote in their state, which depends on the crime, the time served, and the extent of their criminal records.


I checked out the website at http://www.arrestfoundation.org/index.htm , which argues that there is a great deal of nonviolent offenders or people who have had a run in with the law at some point, but have been rehabilitated. They also state that the way hiring managers deal with background checks is discriminatory to those with criminal records, reporting that most employers make their hiring decision based on the background check before the applicant has a chance to explain the crime or make the case that they have been rehabilitated. ADF also believes that hiring ex-offenders will decrease the rate of recidivism and reduce the overall crime rate.

Here’s my take on ADF’s position…


People who make mistakes pay for them in one way or another and those who truly want to change their lives after crime naturally must try harder than law abiding citizens to get a job. But that is the additional price they pay for the crimes they committed, whether it’s right or wrong. Those of us who have never broken the law should be given preference above those who have. Why should an employer simply trust every applicant with a criminal record and give ex-offenders a chance? It must be on a case-by-case basis and depending on the position in relation to the crime. I wouldn’t hire a two-time thief to run a cash register, for instance.


If you have a criminal record you know is going to show up on a background check, you will have to go the extra mile in contacting the hiring manager and convincing him or her that you are a changed person and deserve a chance at a job or career, but you can feel confident that you have the right to vote (if allowed in your state).
I would advise those with criminal records to go to our MyBackgroundCheck.com newsroom where there are two helpful articles on how background checks affect job seekers and explore other resources throughout the site.


Industry experts, ex-offenders, concerned citizens, and HR people are welcome to post comments to this with thoughts on these issues.

Comments

9/28/2008 4:17:50 PM #

"assists criminal offenders in expunging criminal records, finding employment , and exercising their rights to vote under certain state laws.


I’m not so sure I want any major criminals choosing my next president or voting on propositions that could sway toward lenient criminal laws,"

This is the only statement in this whole blog that i take issue with. We live in the United States of America, we fought a revolutionary war over representation, we fought a civil war over citizen rights, and though we don't call it a war the civil rights movement fought for equal treatment of all americans. Through out our countries history people have fought for their rights and some have one and others have lost, but what makes our country great is the fact that because they are American they have rights. For the 200 plus years of our countries existance we have fought for our right to vote and be equal. Saying that criminals should be able to vote is tantamount to saying that Non Land owning people can't vote, or that women can't vote. The people in our prisons as long as they are citizens of this Country should have the right to vote, they should be encouraged to vote.

So before you decide that the right to vote should be taken away look at the years it took us to get that right. Look at the suffering that all people in this country went through, don't assume that because someone is in prison they are less of a citizen than you are.

Josh United States

10/10/2008 1:45:49 AM #

I agree with the article and I am also against the criminals voting rights should be taken off. I agree that they are also citizens. But being responsible citizens they shouldn't have committed crime in their own country against their own people. So are they good enough to vote to select a responsible person to take care of this country?? when they themselves are not responsible enough towards their country??

seems United States

6/21/2009 7:50:02 PM #

Nice article.I agree with the article and I am also against the criminals voting rights should be taken off.They are also citizens,but they should have responsibility...

Life insurance United States

7/31/2009 10:39:53 AM #

They have every right to vote as with all other citizens. Even if they are criminals, their opinions still count, they are still Americans, and no matter how much crimes they have committed i still think most have the country's progress and success at heart. God bless America!

Charlie Davidson United States

7/31/2009 5:49:32 PM #

I feel to disagree with it that criminals should not be allowed to vote. This is harsh thing to do. If they have done something wrong and then they want to be a good citizen then they should get that chance. Not all fingers are equal in society. But if you still feel that they should not be allowed then there are also people other then criminals who should not be allowed to vote. Anyone can make judgment error.

sem U.A.E.

8/21/2009 2:27:55 PM #

Thanks for sharing this informative post.

Paid Surveys United Kingdom

9/15/2009 9:14:54 AM #

If someone has committed crime this does not mean that he should not have right to vote. But yes their record need to be maintained.

dubai flats for rent U.A.E.

10/22/2009 6:49:03 AM #

I like what I see. keep it going

fast cash advance United States

Add comment




biuquote
  • Comment
  • Preview
Loading





Subscribe to our Blog

Join Our Network
  A BBB Accredited Business   Founding Memeber of The National Association of Professional Background Screeners
 
About Us
Core Principles
Community Blog
Help & Support
Helpful Resources
Our Company
Employment Opportunities
Contact Us
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Site Map
Personal Solutions
Personal Background Checks
Employment Background Checks
Student Background Checks
Volunteer Background Checks
Renter Background Checks
Vendor Background Checks
Dating Background Checks
Background Check Monitoring
Drug Testing
Credit Reporting
Business Solutions
Small Business Solutions
Volunteer & Non Profits
Schools/Universities
Landlord Screening Solutions
Hospital Screening & Credentialing Solutions
Corporate Paid Screening
  ©2012 MyBackgroundCheck.com. All Rights Reserved.