Recent Comments




New CA Law Reveals Several Hundreds Of Health Data Breach Reports

July 13, 2009 16:01 by Tom Ahearn

According to a story on Wired.com, a new law that went into effect January 1 requiring health care organizations in California to report suspected incidents of unauthorized data breaches of a patient’s personally identifiable health information – both intentional and unintentional – to the California Department of Public Health has led to officials receiving more than 800 reports in the first five months of this year.

The agency was surprised by the large number of health data breach reports it received in such a short period, according to the Journal of the American Health Information Management Association (AHIMA), and expects the numbers to increase even more as organizations become more familiar with reporting procedures.

Officials have conducted full investigations on 122 cases so far and confirmed 116 as actual data breaches. Most of the types of data breaches reported so far – which also include complaints from patients – have been unintentional. However, the Journal reports that officials can fine offending organizations or individuals up to $250,000 depending on the nature of the data breach and the extent of the harm it caused.

One such fine occurred after investigators determined that workers at a Los Angeles-based hospital inappropriately accessed the medical records of Nadya Suleman – also known as the “Octomom” – who received extensive publicity after giving birth to octuplets following fertility treatments. Investigators found that the hospital had been negligent in protecting Suleman’s medical record after discovering that an employee had improperly viewed her health data.

In addition, recently deceased actress Farrah Fawcett had also filed a complaint accusing employees in an LA-area hospital of providing information about her to a reporter.

California passed the first data breach notification law (which went into effect in July 2003) that required entities doing business in the state to notify consumers when their personally identifiable information (PII) – such as a name, date of birth, and Social Security or credit card number – was breached. The law helped expose the extent of the data breach problem and prompted other states to follow suit with their own laws.

California’s new medical data breach law, which is unpopular with many health care organizations, is the first in the nation and is being closely watched by other states.

While most background check companies focus on employers, MyBackgroundCheck.com offers consumers, jobseekers, students, and volunteers the chance to give themselves background checks and keep personal information secure, accurate, and up-to-date. For information about how personal background checks can help you avoid identity theft and privacy loss, visit www.mybackgroundcheck.com, email info@mybackgroundcheck.com, or call 1-800-503-2364. To follow MyBackgroundCheck.com on Twitter, visit www.twitter.com/MyBackgroundChk.

tahearn@mybackgroundcheck.com

Blogging
Fusion Blog Directory Business Blogs -
BlogCatalog Blog Directory Directory of Jobs Blogs Technorati Profile

*We welcome relevant comments and questions from consumers, experts, and human resources professionals. Please do not submit comments with advertisements as they will not be posted publicly. Thanks for visiting our blog!

Comments

August 3. 2009 09:40

Confidentiality is a must in hospitals. Also, I do not think that it is not right to divulge any kind of information which is not yours personally.

dentists in Northampton

August 3. 2009 09:40

Confidentiality is a must in hospitals. Also, I do not think that it is not right to divulge any kind of information which is not yours personally.

dentists in Northampton

August 4. 2009 10:35

Thanks for the post. Actually, health data shouldn't be disclosed. All hospital authorities should take proper care to maintain patient's health data.

acai burn

August 8. 2009 10:27

Nice post.Can anyone name a medical transcription company that provides services to reputed healthcare Organizations?

online drugs

August 11. 2009 06:24

I could agree with what the two commentor said. Health information should be held private and should not be allowed to disclose to anyone without the patient's approval.

best weight loss pills

August 11. 2009 06:24

I could not agree more with what the two commentors said. Health information should be held private and should not be allowed to disclose to anyone without the patient's approval.

best weight loss pills

August 11. 2009 11:49

also I think every record will have to be digital by 2015

Indiana heart

August 14. 2009 03:32

this one rather comes to me as a real shock, its not fair to disclose your health datas to a third party thats something hospital must take it very seriously.

Drug Rehab Austin

August 21. 2009 03:37

Patient's privacy is a must. The hospitals must ensure the privacy of patient's confidentials medical information.

Kidney Infection Symptoms

November 19. 2009 21:57

Public health looks at everyone from all over. We (I'm an epidemiologist) are concerned with things that may be coming down the pike and hit all of us (like bird flu, etc.).

asn supplements

Add comment


 

  Country flag

Note: the following html tags can be used to customize your comment (optional):
[b][/b] - [i][/i] - [u][/u]- [quote][/quote]